SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004

OR

Commission File Number 0-20001

NATIONAL VISION, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Georgia
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

58-1910859
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

296 Grayson Highway, Lawrenceville, Georgia
(Address of principal executive offices)

30045
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (770) 822-3600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
12% Senior Secured Notes due 2009

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

1

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ

The number of shares of Common Stock of the registrant outstanding as of March 8, 2004, was 5,243,047. The aggregate market value of shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2003, was approximately $3.3 million based on a closing price of $0.68 per share on the American Stock Exchange on such date. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers and directors of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such directors and officers are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates portions of our proxy statement mailed to shareholders in connection with our 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.

2

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

National Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) is a retail optical company that operated, as of January 3, 2004, 468 vision centers in the United States and Mexico. Our vision centers are located inside 396 Wal-Mart stores (including 37 in Mexico), 47 Fred Meyer stores and on 25 U.S. military bases located within the United States. We depend on our domestic Wal-Mart locations for substantially all of our revenues and cash flow. Our vision centers sell a wide range of optical products including eyeglasses, contact lenses and sunglasses. Independent optometrists operate their own practices within substantially all of our vision centers, providing our customers with convenient access to eye examinations and contact lens fittings. To support our retail operations, we also operate two manufacturing and distribution centers.

Current and prospective shareholders and holders of our Notes are encouraged to carefully read all of the disclosures contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As described in greater detail elsewhere herein, we are primarily focused on three significant issues: our license agreement with Wal-Mart, our new business opportunities and our financial position including the profitability and cash flow of our existing store base. The importance of these issues is summarized in the remainder of this introductory section.

Our leases with Wal-Mart for domestic locations have begun to expire in significant numbers. The lease on each domestic store provides for a nine-year initial term and a three-year renewal term. If we are operating in a store that is converted to a Wal-Mart supercenter, our lease term at that location starts over. To our knowledge, Wal-Mart is the only other entity operating vision centers within its domestic stores, and Wal-Mart has not offered us leases for additional stores or renewals of expiring leases. Since opening our 400th store within a domestic Wal-Mart location in 2001, we have, through January 3, 2004, closed 41 such stores. We expect to close another 45 domestic Wal-Mart locations in 2004 as a result of lease expirations. In addition and at our request, during the first half of 2004 Wal-Mart will allow us to exit 13 unprofitable domestic stores prior to the expiration of the initial lease term for these locations.

As a result of our declining number of vision centers in Wal-Mart stores, we devote much attention to developing new businesses. We are seeking additional host environments in which to operate and are seeking to expand our presence on military bases. Additionally, we have tested and expect to continue to test new retail concepts. During 2004, for example, we will test the viability of a home medical equipment concept by opening at least two locations within domestic Wal-Mart stores.

We emerged from bankruptcy in 2001 and issued our 12% Notes in the aggregate face amount of $120 million, resulting in a substantial interest burden. The Note Indenture may limit the expenditures we are able to make in businesses outside of optical. Through January 3, 2004, we have, pursuant to the terms of the Note Indenture, redeemed approximately $14.0 million of Notes at par. Additionally, we have repurchased, in negotiated or open market transactions, Notes with a par value of $10.5 million at an aggregate cost of approximately $6.6 million. The Notes mature on March 30, 2009, and provide for continuing mandatory semi-annual redemption payments, subject to the terms and conditions of the indenture. We intend to continue to repurchase Notes from time to time in negotiated or open market transactions.

Our ability to develop new businesses and to reduce our debt is, of course, tied directly to our ability to generate operating cash flow. Since emerging from bankruptcy in 2001, we have improved our operating processes and continue to focus on achieving greater profitability and stronger cash flow. Because we are operating a declining number of stores, we must improve, and have improved, individual store operating results in order to achieve bottom-line growth and stronger cash flow in the aggregate. We remain highly focused on improving our operating results as a means of supporting our debt reduction and business growth objectives.

The remainder of this Annual Report on Form 10-K expands further upon these matters, describes our operating strategies and emphasizes the risks inherent in our company and the industry in which we operate.

3

Date of Information

Unless otherwise expressly stated, all information in Item 1 of this Form 10-K is as of January 3, 2004.

History of the Company

The Company was founded as National Vision Associates, Ltd. in 1990, when we entered into a master license agreement with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”). As subsequently amended through 1994, the agreement gave us the right to open 400 vision centers in Wal-Mart stores. We opened the 400th such store in 2001.

In late 1997, we made a strategic decision to diversify our revenue base through acquisitions in the freestanding optical market. In October 1997, we acquired Midwest Vision, Inc. with 51 freestanding retail optical centers in four Midwest states. In July 1998, we acquired Frame-n-Lens Optical, Inc. with 150 freestanding vision centers in California and 120 vision centers located within Sam’s Clubs. In October 1998, we acquired New West Eyeworks, Inc. with 175 retail optical centers in 13 states, including approximately 120 vision centers in freestanding locations and more than 50 host vision centers in Fred Meyer stores. Following the acquisitions, we changed our name to Vista Eyecare, Inc. To fund the acquisitions, we issued $125 million of Senior Subordinated Notes due 2005 bearing interest at 12.75% per annum.

Sales shortfalls in the freestanding stores caused adverse pressure on cash flow and liquidity. After failing to negotiate an out-of-court restructuring with the holders of our Senior Subordinated Notes, we filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 on April 5, 2000.

During the bankruptcy process, we closed or disposed of all of our freestanding stores and closed all of our host vision centers operating in Sam’s Clubs and in Meijer Thrifty Acres stores. On May 31, 2001, we emerged from bankruptcy as an optical retailer operating vision centers in host departments, including Wal-Mart and Fred Meyer locations.

Upon emerging from bankruptcy, we changed our name to National Vision, Inc. (“National Vision”) and implemented “fresh start” accounting. As a result, all assets and liabilities were restated to reflect their respective fair values. The consolidated financial statements after emergence are those of a new reporting entity (the “Successor”) and are not comparable to the financial statements of the pre-confirmation company (the “Predecessor”). A black line has been drawn in the financial statements to distinguish Predecessor and Successor results.

Dependence on Domestic Wal-Mart

As of January 3, 2004, we operated 359 vision centers in domestic Wal-Mart stores, all of which operate pursuant to a master license agreement (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Summary of Lease Agreements”). These units generated approximately 89% of our revenue in 2003 and represent the most profitable division of our host retail operations measured as a percent of sales. We therefore depend on Wal-Mart and on our agreement with them for our continued viability unless and until we develop a replacement business.

Vision Center Operations

Our vision centers typically occupy between 500 and 3,000 square feet, including areas for merchandise display, customer service, and contact lens fitting. Each vision center maintains inventory of approximately 950 eyeglass frames and 500 pairs of contact lenses, along with sunglasses and other optical accessories. Our two optical laboratories deliver prescription eyewear to all our vision centers. Approximately 70% of our vision centers have a finishing laboratory, which allows the vision center to provide one-hour service for most single vision prescription lenses. These vision centers carry inventory of approximately 1,000 pairs of spectacle lenses.

In 2002, we began selling a managed care insurance product in our Wal-Mart California vision centers to retail customers who do not otherwise have vision insurance coverage.

4

Marketing

We are a value provider of optical goods and stress that theme in our marketing. We offer everyday low prices at our vision centers. National Vision also has a satisfaction guaranteed customer policy. We are vigilant about ways to lower our own costs so we may pass savings on to our customers.

Managed Vision Care

We expect that in the optical industry, retail sales through numerous managed vision care programs will increase over the next several years as a percentage of overall retail optical sales. Under managed vision care plans, members fulfill their eyecare and eyewear needs either at 1) specific locations designated by the plan sponsor, or 2) at locations outside of the plan’s network where the provider can accept assignment of benefits as an “out-of-network” provider. We believe our network of vision centers combined with the convenience of their locations and our ability to offer low prices should enable us to make competitive bids for managed care contracts and to be an attractive provider for those plans with “out-of-network” benefits. Our declining base of vision centers may adversely affect our ability to compete for managed care contracts. (See “Risk Factors — Our declining base of vision centers in Wal-Mart stores could make it more difficult for us to compete.”) Managed care sales accounted for approximately 10%, 11% and 12% of our retail sales in 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively.

Marks

Our vision centers in domestic Wal-Mart are identified as the “Vision Center located in Wal-Mart” and in Mexico as “Opticas Centro de Vision.” Our vision centers on Military bases are identified as “National Vision Optical.” Three of our vision centers within Fred Meyer operate as “The Optical Shoppe”. We also use the “Vista Optical” name to identify some of our vision centers operating in Fred Meyer locations. As part of our agreement to sell the freestanding vision centers, we obtained a license to continue our use of this name through January 2004. The licensor of this mark filed for bankruptcy during 2003. We have expressed an interest in purchasing this trade-name, but we may, however, lose the right to use this name. We are continuing to use the “Vista Optical” name in certain locations while we await a response from the trustee of the bankruptcy estate.

Employees

We employ 2,020 associates on a full-time basis and 645 associates on a part-time basis. We have 2,210 associates engaged in retail sales, 215 in laboratory and distribution operations, and 240 in management and administration. Apart from our retail employees in Mexico, none of our employees are governed by any collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our employment relations are generally good.

Optometrists

Optometrists are important to the success of our vision centers. We strive to have an optometrist on a full-time basis at most of our locations. These optometrists are typically independent from us and lease a portion of our locations for vision examinations. We typically charge rent to these optometrists, in exchange for the premises and the equipment which we provide. Our agreement with Wal-Mart contemplates that we generally will have an optometrist on duty at least 48 hours each week. Our relationships with optometrists are subject to extensive regulation. (See “Government Regulation” below.)

Manufacturing and Distribution

We operate two manufacturing and distribution facilities that supply substantially all merchandise requirements of our vision centers. The facilities are located in Lawrenceville, Georgia (this facility also includes our central administrative offices) and St. Cloud, Minnesota.

Our distribution centers provide lens blanks, frames, contact lenses, and sunglasses to our vision centers. We use an overnight delivery service to ship completed orders and replenishment items to the vision centers. The distribution centers and the manufacturing facilities are interfaced with our management information system. Raw materials consist of frames and lenses which are readily available from multiple vendors.

5

Lease Agreements

We have agreements governing our operations in host environments, such as Wal-Mart. Typically, each agreement is for a base term, followed by an option to renew for a specified length of time. The agreements provide for payments of minimum and percentage rent, and also contain other customary provisions. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Summary of Lease Agreements”.

Government Regulation

Our business is heavily regulated by federal, state, and local law. We must comply with federal laws such as the Social Security Act (which applies to our participation in Medicare programs), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) (which governs our participation in managed care programs), and the Food and Drug Administration Act (which regulates medical devices such as contact lenses). We also must comply with the privacy regulations and the forthcoming security regulations under HIPAA. In addition, all states have passed laws that govern or affect our arrangements with the optometrists who practice in our vision centers. Some states, such as California, Texas, North Carolina, and Kansas, have particularly extensive and burdensome requirements that affect the way we do business. In California, optometrists who practice adjacent to our retail locations are providers to and subtenants of a subsidiary, which is licensed as a single-service HMO.

Many states also have adopted laws that mirror the federal laws described above. Local ordinances (such as zoning requirements) can also impose significant burdens and costs of compliance. Frequently, our competitors sit on state and local boards. Our risks and costs of compliance are often increased as a result.

We believe that we substantially comply with material regulations that apply to our business.

Competition

The retail eye care industry is extremely competitive. We compete with national companies such as LensCrafters and Cole; we also compete with numerous regional and local firms. In addition, optometrists, ophthalmologists, and opticians provide many of the same goods and services we provide. The level and intensity of competition can vary dramatically depending on the particular market. We believe that we have numerous competitive advantages, such as our everyday low pricing, product selection, and quality and consistency of service.

We also compete for managed care business. Our competition for this business is principally the larger national and regional optical firms. Competition for this business is driven by size of provider network, quality and consistency of service, and by pricing of vision care services. We have one of the largest networks in the country and believe that the size of the network gives us a competitive advantage. Our declining base of vision centers may adversely affect our ability to compete for managed care contracts. (See “Risk Factors — Our declining base of vision centers in Wal-Mart stores could make it more difficult for us to compete.”)

Several of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to engage in extensive and prolonged price promotions that may adversely affect our business. They may also be able to spend more than we do for advertising. Our two largest competitors have agreed to merge. The merger, if completed, could adversely affect our business. (See “Risk Factors — The retail eyecare industry is extremely competitive”.)

6

Mexico Operations

We operate 37 vision centers in Mexico under a master license agreement with Wal-Mart. Our operations in Mexico face unique risks, such as currency devaluations, inflation and difficulties in cross-cultural marketing. Information relative to sales and long-lived assets for the United States and Mexico for the years ended January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002, the seven months ended December 29, 2001, and the five months ended June 2, 2001, are summarized in the following tables (amounts in thousands):

Available Information

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Information about National Vision, Inc, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, may be obtained at that website (www.sec.gov) or by any shareholder (without charge) upon written request to National Vision, Inc., 296 Grayson Highway, Lawrenceville, GA 30045, Attn: Investor Relations. In addition, our most recent public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available on our web site at www.nationalvision.com.

7

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our 468 vision centers in operation as of January 3, 2004 are located as follows:

Our headquarters in Lawrenceville, Georgia are located in a 66,000 square foot building that includes a distribution center and optical laboratory. The building is leased through January 2009.

We operate a second distribution center and optical laboratory facility located in St. Cloud, Minnesota. This 20,000 square foot facility is subject to a lease that expires in October 2007.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Litigation in California

On September 3, 2003, the Second Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal affirmed a prior judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court (Case No. BC 274257) dismissing litigation that had been instituted against us on May 20, 2002 by Consumer Cause, Inc. alleging that our business model in California failed to comply with applicable legal requirements. The complaint sought attorney fees and an injunction prohibiting us from continuing the alleged violations. The case brought by Consumer Cause, Inc. against us was similar to a case previously brought by the California Attorney General against one of our competitors, alleging, among other things, that their business model fails to comply with applicable legal requirements. (See “Risk Factors — We are subject to state and local regulations of the vision care industry”). The California Supreme Court has “depublished” the favorable opinion of the Court of Appeal in the case brought against us by Consumer Cause, Inc. Under California law, the effect of depublication is to prevent other parties from citing the case as legal authority.

8

Chapter 11 Proceedings

On November 7, 2003, we resolved the final outstanding claim in our Chapter 11 proceeding. In mid-February 2004, we authorized the trustee to distribute the remaining Notes to creditors on a pro rata basis. We expect that all remaining Notes and shares of common stock will be distributed during the second calendar quarter of 2004. The issuance of these notes and shares could depress the price for our securities.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the last quarter of fiscal 2003.

9

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our Common Stock is listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “NVI”. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low prices of our Common Stock.

As of March 1, 2004, there were approximately 371 holders of record of our Common Stock.

We have never paid dividends on our common stock. In addition, each of our indenture and our credit facility prohibits us from paying cash dividends.

10

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Successor for the years ended January 3, 2004 (“2003”) and December 28, 2002, (“2002”) and the seven months ended December 29, 2001, and from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Predecessor for the five months ended June 2, 2001 and the years ended December 30, 2000 (“2000”) and January 1, 2000 (“1999”) (dollars in thousands):

Fiscal 2003 included 53 weeks, whereas each of the other full years presented herein represents a 52-week fiscal year.

11

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview of Results

Our primary source of revenue is from retail sales of eyeglasses, contact lenses and other optical merchandise in the vision centers we operate within host environments and on military bases. In 2002 we also began selling vision examination insurance in our California stores. In 2003, we began manufacturing eyeglasses for a fifteen-store independent optical chain.

Fiscal 2003 was the first year in which we closed a significant number of domestic vision centers as we reached the end of their contractual option period. We had opened our 400th domestic Wal-Mart store in 2001 and still operated 399 of these at the end of 2002. During 2003, forty of these leases expired and we operated 359 vision centers within domestic Wal-Mart locations at January 3, 2004.

During 2004, we expect to close an additional 58 stores, including thirteen stores whose leases were not scheduled to expire, but which we requested to close because of poor operating results and prospects.

In 2003, we began to narrow our strategies for coping with the gradual closing of stores. We settled on three dominant strategies:

We made significant changes in our existing optical business in 2003. These changes began to benefit our financial results by late in the third quarter of 2003, and we expect that they will benefit future periods as well. The financial impact of these changes is discussed in further detail in the following sections.

In addition to the operational changes, we also tested two concepts within the optics category in 2003: 1) operating optical kiosks within a mall environment and 2) selling disposable hearing aids and hearing exams within existing vision centers. Neither of these concepts was sufficiently successful to justify continued investment, and both tests were stopped by the end of the year. The financial impact of these two tests was not significant to us.

12

Results of Operations

Our results of operations in any period are significantly affected by the number and mix of vision centers operating during such period. At January 3, 2004, we operated 468 vision centers, versus 518 vision centers at December 28, 2002 and 514 vision centers at December 29, 2001. The following table sets forth information about the number and type of vision centers we owned and operated as of the end of fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

13

National Vision, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the years ended January 3, 2004, December 28, 2002,
and December 29, 2001
(In thousands)

We emerged from Chapter 11 on May 31, 2001 and implemented “fresh start” accounting as of June 2, 2001. Results of operations for the 3-day period from May 31, 2001 through June 2, 2001 were not material. In accordance with fresh start accounting, all assets and liabilities were restated to reflect their respective fair values. The consolidated financial statements after that date are those of a new reporting entity and are not comparable to the periods prior to emergence. However, for purposes of this discussion, the Successor results for the seven months ended December 29, 2001 have been combined with the Predecessor results of five months ended June 2, 2001. Differences resulting from fresh start accounting are explained when necessary.

14

Continuing Operations

Total Net Revenue. Total net revenue is comprised of retail sales, premium revenues and other revenues. In 2003, total domestic comparable store sales were up 5.0% over the prior year. Domestic comparable store sales for 2003 were calculated using the first 52 weeks of 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 which was a 52-week year. This calculation only includes vision centers that were open for all of fiscal 2002 and 2003. The following reconciliation shows the components of the change in retail sales (amounts in thousands):

During 2003 we made several changes to help drive domestic sales. Although it is difficult to quantify the result of each of these activities, we believe that the following factors had the most significant impact on our retail domestic comparable store sales increase of $10.8 million or 5% over 2002:

15

Our 2002 domestic comparable store sales increase of approximately $7.3 million over 2001 was largely the result of a change in our frame and lens presentation. Historically, our in-store presentation of frame and lens options was based on a package price concept. The package price included a pair of base lenses, a frame and certain lens options. In July 2002, we changed our presentation strategy by “unbundling” the package price so that pricing for frames and lenses is presented separately in the store. The presentation is intended to be clearer as well as more concise and customer-friendly, and is similar to product and price presentation at a majority of our competitors’ stores. After an initial orientation phase, we experienced increases in the number of spectacle units sold and in the average spectacle transaction value.

Managed care sales accounted for approximately 10%, 11% and 12% of our sales in 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. We work with large and small managed care payors to provide vision benefits to their members. We expect that retail optical sales through managed vision care programs will increase over the next several years as a percentage of overall retail optical sales. (See “Risk Factors — Our declining base of vision centers in Wal-Mart stores could make it more difficult for us to compete.”) As such, changes in the managed vision care industry are likely to impact our sales. Effective October 1, 2003, a large national managed care payor changed its policy regarding out-of-network providers. These changes limited our ability to verify benefit coverage and to accept assignment of the payor’s benefits on behalf of our customer. Prior to October 2003, we were generating sales of approximately $3.7 million on an annualized basis as a result of being an out-of-network provider for this payor. The net impact of this change has been a substantial reduction in sales as an out-of-network provider for this payor. We are working aggressively to mitigate the decreases in lost sales. We have attempted to discuss these matters with the payor, but do not believe that the payor intends to change its new policy. We are evaluating alternatives but can provide no assurance that they will be successful or that we will again be able to participate as an out-of-network provider for this payor. We will continue to work toward adding third party plans and payors as part of our ongoing managed care growth strategy.

In May 2003, we began offering a twelve month extended warranty plan in our Wal-Mart vision centers to provide for repair and replacement service during the first year after purchase. Revenue recognized in 2003 was approximately $2.0 million. By the fourth quarter of 2003, approximately 45% of our eyeglass transactions included an extended warranty purchase. We expect these increased warranty sales to continue into 2004. This revenue is reflected within “Retail sales, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The 2003 increase of $4.3 million in premium revenue can be largely attributed to increased enrollments in our California health maintenance organization. The HMO had 150,000 enrollees (or participants) at the end of 2003 compared to 48,000 at the end of 2002. We began selling this managed care insurance product in the Wal-Mart California vision centers in the second quarter of 2002. Revenue from premiums is recognized over the life of the policy as the related services are rendered.

In 2003, we began manufacturing eyeglasses for an independent chain of fifteen vision centers. Total revenue from this activity was $877,000 during the year.

16

Gross Profit. The components of sales and gross profit are detailed below (dollars in thousands):

We attribute the 2003 increase in retail gross profit dollars primarily to sales increases arising out of merchandising changes made beginning in mid-2002 and continuing throughout 2003. We have also established a process for updating our selections on a more regular basis. Eyeglass sales are more than 70% of our retail sales. Therefore, changes in frames and lenses have the greatest impact on our business.

The 2002 improvement in gross profit margin percentage and a portion of the 2003 improvement are primarily the result of a shift in sales mix towards eyeglasses, coupled with an increase in eyeglass margins due to the Company’s “unbundling” of frame and lens pricing. In the second half of 2003, we began testing different lens offerings to improve eyeglass profit margins and simplify customer presentation. We have substantially completed our lens test as it relates to single vision lenses, but expect this process to continue for multifocal lenses throughout 2004. We have begun to see slight improvements in eyeglass margins as a result of the change in lens offering in the fourth quarter of 2003 and expect this to continue.

These improvements in 2003 and 2002 retail gross profit margins were somewhat reduced by increases in rent as the number of Wal-Mart locations entering the option period of their lease increased in relation to the total number of vision centers. In 2003, we recorded an effective rent of approximately 14% on revenues from our Wal-Mart locations. Because of minimum rent increases during the option period, we need to increase comparable store sales in order to keep our rent percentage at these levels. Any decrease in sales would have a negative impact on occupancy expense as a percent of sales. Approximately 124 and 126 vision centers were operating within their option period at January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002, respectively. The 2002 decrease in gross profit dollars is the result of the disposal of the freestanding vision centers in April 2001.

Insurance gross profit represents premium revenue less claims expenses for a managed care product that we began selling in the Wal-Mart California vision centers in the second quarter of 2002. This insurance product has significantly lower margins than do our retail products. The introduction of this product increased total 2003 revenues by $4.3 million over 2002 and gross profit dollars by $139,000, but decreased total gross profit as a percent of net sales by 0.8 percentage points.

17

Selling, General and Administrative Expense (“SG&A expense”). Selling, general and administrative expense includes both store operating expenses and home office overhead costs and is shown below.

Sales increases in 2003 resulted in a reduction of SG & A expense as a percent of sales. 2002 expenses are not directly comparable to 2001 expenses because of the freestanding stores that were disposed of during the first four months of 2001. As a result, comparisons to 2001 are not meaningful. Significant factors influencing changes in expenses in 2003 are discussed below.

The following factors influenced vision center payroll and field supervision costs. These costs comprise approximately 56% of our selling, general and administrative expense:

The following factors influenced other expenses included within the selling, general and administrative expense category:

Restructuring Expense. During August 2003, we initiated and completed a restructuring of the retail field and home office retail support center. The process resulted in a reduction in headcount approximating 15% of both the retail field management organization and the home office retail support center organization. The cost of the restructuring process was $484,000, which included separation costs and outplacement costs. The annual payroll and related costs represented by the reduction in force was approximately $1.9 million. We cannot guarantee the savings from this reduction in force will reduce our payroll and related costs in subsequent years or that it will reduce such expense by the same or similar amounts in subsequent years.

18

Impairment of Long Lived Assets. Historically, we have operated our vision centers to the maximum term of the lease, including the exercise of all available renewal options in most cases. Our strategy was to maintain store operations, even if the store was under-performing and devote our attention to correcting the store’s problems. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we revised our strategy to assess under-performing stores prior to the lease termination date, and potentially close the under-performing stores in order to maximize operating profitability. As a result, we identified certain store locations with a history of operating losses that we do not expect to become profitable without significant cost and effort. We intend to close 13 of these locations in March and April of 2004. Closing these vision centers prior to the end of their lease term (or option period) allows us to focus greater attention on maximizing profits from more promising locations and developing a new business model.

For the 13 locations that we expect to close prior to the lease termination date, we reviewed the locations for potential impairment by comparing the future expected undiscounted cash flows for these locations to the carrying value of their long-lived assets. The long-lived asset carrying value for 12 of the locations exceeded the future expected undiscounted cash flows from the locations. Therefore, impairment was determined to exist for these 12 locations. We also reviewed the remainder of store locations for potential impairment and identified 30 additional vision centers in Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart de Mexico, Fred Meyer and on military bases which were determined to be impaired given that the expected future undiscounted cash flows from these locations are less than the carrying value of their assets. As a result, we have recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $550,000 to write-down these long-lived assets to their fair market value. Fair market value was determined using the expected discounted cash flows for each location. This impairment was reflected for leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment at these 42 locations.

Interest Expense. The outstanding balance of our long-term Senior Subordinated Notes is the primary driver of interest expense. Interest expense decreased by approximately $1.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 due to principal repayments and Note repurchases made during 2002 and 2003. During the first five months of 2001, when we were under the protection of the bankruptcy court, we did not accrue interest expense on our former Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding of $125 million. When we emerged from bankruptcy on May 31, 2001, we restructured our debt and began accruing interest at 12% on our $120 million of newly issued Senior Subordinated Notes. The table below rolls forward our long-term outstanding debt balances for 2003, 2002 and 2001 and the principal repayments and Note repurchases made each year (in thousands):

          The outstanding Senior Note balance at December 29, 2001 is not comparable to Senior Notes outstanding at the beginning of 2001. The outstanding notes at the beginning of 2001 were issued by the Predecessor and were not accruing interest due to our Chapter 11 proceedings. The weighted average balance outstanding for 2001 is not meaningful.

Gain on Repurchase of Notes. During 2003 and 2002, we repurchased our Senior Subordinated Notes and recorded gains from those repurchases as shown below:

19

Discontinued Operations. During 2003, 42 of our vision center leases expired, resulting in the closure of 40 Wal-Mart vision centers and 2 vision centers on military bases. In addition, during the second and third quarter of 2003, we closed 12 under-performing vision centers in Fred Meyer locations prior to their scheduled lease expiration. Condensed information for these 54 closed stores is presented below. The net loss on disposal of these operations includes severance and closing costs and gains from the sale of certain assets. Operating results for these closed vision centers have been presented separately as discontinued operations for all periods in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle. We adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02 — 16, “Accounting by a Customer for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”) at the beginning of 2003. This Issue addresses the method by which retailers account for vendor allowances. Prior to fiscal 2003, we received vendor allowances through co-op advertising agreements, which were classified in the income statement as a reduction of advertising expense. As a result of the adoption of EITF 02-16, certain vendor allowances, which formerly were treated as a reduction in advertising costs, are presented as a reduction of inventory cost and subsequently as a component of cost of goods sold. On the first day of fiscal 2003, we recorded additional expense of $564,000 as the cumulative effect for this change in accounting principle. This amount reflects the portion of vendor allowances that would have reduced inventory costs had this new accounting pronouncement been in effect at the end of 2002.

20

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: EBITDA

We frequently refer to EBITDA in this document. EBITDA is calculated as net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, non-cash items, and reorganization items as defined in the terms of our Senior Subordinated Debt Indenture. We refer to EBITDA because:

EBITDA does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by generally accepted accounting principles, is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow needs, should not be considered an alternative to net income or to cash flow from operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP) and should not be considered an indication of our operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures for other companies.

The following is a reconciliation of net earnings to EBITDA (amounts in thousands):

SUMMARY OF LEASE AGREEMENTS

We have agreements governing our operations in host environments. Typically, each agreement is for a base term, followed by an option to renew for a specified length of time. The agreements provide for payments of base and/or percentage rent, and also contain other customary leasing provisions. The table below sets forth key data about each of these agreements:

21

Domestic Wal-Mart Vision Centers

Our agreement with Wal-Mart gave us the right to open 400 vision centers, the last of which opened in 2001. Our agreement with Wal-Mart also provides that, if Wal-Mart relocates our vision center for any reason, including converting its own store to a supercenter (a store which contains a grocery department in addition to the traditional Wal-Mart store offering) the term of our lease begins again. During 2003, 18 locations were relocated, effectively renewing these leases. For these 18 relocations, an average of 117 months were added to the lease term assuming all available options are exercised. We expect approximately 15 to 20 leases to relocate to supercenters in 2004. We expect the 2004 relocations to add an average of approximately 117 months to each relocated vision center’s maximum lease term. As of January 3, 2004, we have 158 vision centers located in Wal-Mart supercenters. We believe that Wal-Mart may in the future convert many of its stores and thereby cause many of our leases to start again. The number of lease expirations indicated could decrease if there are future supercenter conversions. We have received no assurances from Wal-Mart as to how many of their locations will ultimately be converted.

On a frequent basis, we monitor the number of vision centers along with total lease months remaining under the Wal-Mart Master License Agreement. Our measurement of lease months assumes that we exercise all available renewal options, exclusive of known and expected non-renewals, and that supercenter conversions currently scheduled will trigger new vision center leases. The remaining lease months may be affected by the conversion of the host store to a supercenter. Additionally, the remaining lease months may be affected by our decisions regarding exercise of lease renewal options.

Lease months shown reflect: 1) expected vision center relocations, whether confirmed or unconfirmed, 2) the expected closure of locations prior to the end of their lease term, and 3) any lease options that are not expected to be exercised. The following table lists our remaining lease months under our Wal-Mart agreement as of the respective fiscal months.

We view remaining lease months as a proxy for the remaining cash flow associated with the operations of our existing vision centers under our agreement with Wal-Mart. We recognize, however, that there is no necessary connection between remaining lease months and expected cash flow and that our declining base of vision centers could make it more difficult for us to maintain current levels of cash flow recorded by our existing vision centers (see “Risk Factors- Our declining base of vision centers in Wal-Mart stores could make it more difficult for us to compete”).

In 2004, 58 leases are expected to close over the course of the year, 18 in the first quarter, 13 in the second quarter, 17 in the third quarter, and 10 in the fourth quarter. These stores represent annualized sales of approximately $30.6 million and annualized store-level operating income of approximately $4.0 million. Of the 58 Wal-Mart leases expected to close in 2004, we have elected to close 13 locations prior to the end of their term due to store level operating losses. Store-level operating income excludes corporate overhead and other costs not specifically attributable to individual stores. The 13 leases had an average of 68 months remaining, assuming all options were exercised.

As of March 1, 2004, we have closed 10 Wal-Mart vision centers in fiscal 2004. We have experienced sales declines of approximately 25% in the final month of operations for stores that are closing. We also have incurred store closing costs, including severance, that has averaged between $4,000 and $10,000 per vision center.

As of January 3, 2004, we had 124 vision centers that were operating in the three-year extension period of the Wal-Mart lease. We exercised our option to renew the leases for the three year extension period for 48 Wal-Mart vision centers in 2003. The base term for 57 vision centers expires in 2004, and we will need to determine which leases to extend. At this time, we have elected to close 8 of these locations at the end of the original nine-year lease. We expect to exercise the option for many of our leases. These decisions will be based on various factors, including sales levels, anticipated future profitability, increased minimum rental fees in the option period, and market share.

22

Other Operations

In July 2003, we amended our agreement with Fred Meyer. Our new agreement provides an extension of the original lease term from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2006 and eliminates the five-year option to extend the agreement. The amendment also revises the rent structure, beginning in 2004, to better align rent obligations with individual store performance. Beginning in 2004, we expect to realize rent cost savings on an annualized basis of approximately $1 million, based on each vision center’s sales levels in 2003. Changes in these sales could have an impact on anticipated rent reductions. The amendment also permitted the closure of 12 under-performing locations. Five of these vision centers closed in the second quarter of 2003, and the remaining seven were closed in the third quarter of 2003.

Our agreement with Wal-Mart de Mexico provides that each party will not deal with other parties to operate leased department vision centers in Mexico. This agreement also permits each party to terminate the lease for each vision center which fails to meet minimum sales requirements specified in the agreement. Under our agreement with Wal-Mart de Mexico, we have two options for two-year renewals and one option for an additional one-year renewal for each vision center.

As of January 3, 2004, three of our vision centers in Mexico are operating beyond the original lease term, on a “month-to month” basis. We are currently in negotiations with Wal-Mart de Mexico to amend our existing lease agreement to allow Wal-Mart de Mexico to perform their own vision center tests for a limited time. Should these negotiations be unsuccessful, we would likely close the three locations which are operating beyond the original lease term and continue to operate the remaining locations until such time that their lease expires.

The following table sets forth the number of our vision center leases that expire each year, assuming that we exercise all available options to extend the terms of the leases, excluding 8 such options we have declined or expect to decline to renew as of March 1, 2004. This table includes 14 future Wal-Mart supercenter conversions which are scheduled at this time. These 14 supercenter conversions added an average of 118 months to each location’s lease term.

Leases Expiring in Fiscal Year

We meet with representatives of our host companies on a regular basis and periodically discuss proposed amendments to our master license agreements, as well as expansion opportunities. We can provide no assurances that we will enter into favorable amendments to these agreements or that we will have any opportunities to expand our operations within any of our current host environments.

23

OPERATING STRATEGIES

During much of 2003, we focused heavily upon making changes that would improve our operations and cash flows. The changes affected almost every aspect of our base business, including our frame and lens selection, retail pricing and in-store display, store scheduling, manager and associate incentive programs, training and evaluation, and home office and field supervision staffing levels. We expect these moves to begin to have a significant impact on operating results in 2004, and we will also continue to test and refine other potential improvements. We cannot provide any assurances as to whether such changes will have a positive impact on our operating results or financial condition.

We also tested two new business concepts in 2003, selling eyeglasses from kiosks inside malls and adding a new hearing aid technology to the traditional vision products offered in our optical stores. We tested the eyeglass kiosks in one location and the hearing aid product in two optical stores in Wal-Mart. Neither of these concepts warranted expansion and both were discontinued by the end of the year. The combined cost of testing these two concepts was approximately $145,000.

In 2004, our focus will turn more toward developing a new business that could potentially replace our declining base of stores inside Wal-Mart. We will continue to seek avenues of growth within optics while also seeking new businesses to grow within Wal-Mart. One new business upon which we are presently focused is the home medical equipment (“HME”) business.

The HME category includes wheelchairs, scooters, walkers, bathroom safety seats, shower rails and many other aids to daily living. In our view, the HME marketplace is similar to the optics marketplace of several years ago, when there were no large, dominant national retailers serving the category. The marketplace currently consists mostly of independent operators and we believe it is poised for a gradual shift to larger national players.

We believe that our expertise and experience in optical retailing will give us certain advantages in the home medical equipment business. Both categories benefit from an aging population and involve a quasi-medical sales consultation with virtually every customer. Both require managed care expertise. Importantly, both categories benefit greatly from the consumer awareness generated by walk-by traffic in a Wal-Mart environment.

In the second quarter of 2004, we expect to open HME test stores inside Wal-Mart stores in Pennsylvania and Tennessee. In each of these locations, the population demographics are favorable to an HME business. We anticipate that, by early 2005, we will have sufficient information to determine whether this concept should be expanded. We believe that other companies are testing the sales of home medical equipment in Wal-Mart stores. The Note Indenture may limit the expenditures we are able to make in businesses outside of optical. (See “Risk Factors – Our pursuit of other lines of business could be constrained by the terms of our Indenture”.)

We have begun reviews of other potential businesses that could possibly benefit from the type of traffic that Wal-Mart stores generate. None of these concepts is as far advanced as the HME concept.

As to our potential new businesses, including the HME concept, we cannot presently predict whether any will be successful. We also cannot predict how many locations we may receive in Wal-Mart stores or the terms of any such lease arrangements. (See “Risk Factors — Our operation of optometric vision centers adjacent to Wal-Mart corporate vision centers in California creates financial and regulatory risk”).

Within optics, in the first quarter of 2004 our HMO began opening optometric offices in California Wal-Mart stores adjacent to a vision center operated by Wal-Mart. At March 1, 2004, we have opened four such offices. Of these, three were in Wal-Mart stores in which our leases had expired in 2003 and one was in a recently opened Wal-Mart. In addition, we also opened an optometric office in one California Sam’s Club location.

We contract with optometrists to provide eye examinations in these locations with doctor coverage running as much as 53 hours per week in the busier locations. We estimate that an optometric office will provide less revenue and income than an average vision center. Nonetheless, we consider this an excellent opportunity to continue deriving a revenue stream from stores in which we had previously operated a vision center while adding a revenue stream for newly opened Wal-Mart and Sam’s locations. We expect to open additional such offices in 2004 and 2005. (See “Risk Factors — Our operation of optometric vision centers adjacent to Wal-Mart corporate vision centers in California creates financial and regulatory risk.”).

24

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Since emerging from bankruptcy on May 31, 2001, our operations have generated cash flow in amounts sufficient to fund operating and interest expense, capital expenditures of $12.5 million, mandatory principal redemptions of $14.0 million and discounted debt repurchases costing $10.5 million. We maintain a revolving credit line with Fleet Capital Corporation, a commercial lender, but have generally made borrowings under the credit line for only brief periods of time, near the end of our fiscal first quarter, when several large periodic payments are made.

We also utilize a portion of our line of credit on a year round basis to support a letter of credit required by our workers’ compensation insurance provider. As of March 1, 2004, our unused availability under our credit facility with Fleet was approximately $5.0 million. At January 3, 2004, we had no borrowings under our credit facility, and had letters of credit of $4.3 million outstanding. We believe that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements throughout 2004. We expect that funds available under our credit facility will be utilized only for short-term liquidity needs, if at all. We intend to use available cash for our ongoing operations, repurchase of Notes, and repayment of principal on our outstanding debt.

In December 2003, we amended our credit facility with Fleet Capital Corporation (the “Fleet Facility”). The amendment extended the expiration date of the Fleet Facility from May 30, 2004 to May 30, 2007 and eliminated the previous limit of $3 million in expenditures for repurchases of our Senior Subordinated Notes within each rolling 12 month period. The amendment enables us to repurchase Notes upon meeting certain financial criteria both preceding and following the repurchases. Additionally, the amendment increased availability by approximately $3.0 million. Subsequent to the amendment, we repurchased our Senior Subordinated Notes with a face value of $6.0 million for $3.7 million resulting in a non-cash gain of $2.3 million.

Our Fleet facility contains various restrictive covenants, including requirements that we

We made mandatory principal redemption payments of $5.3 million on August 28, 2003 and $2.9 million on February 28, 2003. We also made a principal redemption payment on the Notes of approximately $545,000 on February 27, 2004 to the trustee for Note holders of record on February 13, 2004. These redemptions are based on the requirements of the indenture and are made at 100% of par. Each principal redemption payment is based on the results for the six-month period ending in June or December, respectively. In addition, we made an interest payment of approximately $6.1 million from existing cash balances on September 27, 2003. The next scheduled interest payment of approximately $5.7 million was made on March 30, 2004.

In May 2003, we began offering a twelve month extended warranty plan in our Wal-Mart vision centers to provide for repair and replacement service during the first year after purchase. The new warranty plan has gained considerable consumer acceptance, and we now sell warranties with approximately 40% of all eyeglass transactions. This revenue is deferred over the life of the warranty. Our deferred warranty revenue at January 3, 2004 was approximately $2.0 million. In fiscal 2003, we received approximately $4.6 million in cash from the sale of warranties. We expect to receive at least this amount in fiscal 2004.

The Company’s capital expenditures have historically been for store openings, relocations, and remodeling, lensmaking and other optometric equipment. During 2004, we expect to open at least two Military stores and to relocate 15 to 20 vision centers within Wal-Mart that have converted to supercenters. These store openings are subject to change depending upon construction schedules and other constraints. For each new center, we expect to spend between $40,000 and $60,000 for fixed assets and up to $15,000 for inventory.

During 2004, we plan to test at least two home medical equipment centers inside Wal-Mart stores. As with all of our test concepts, we plan to prudently invest in this new idea, until we prove that this concept has the consumer acceptance needed to become our next growth vehicle. We expect to invest approximately $75,000 in fixed assets and inventory in each of our first two test locations (See “Risk Factors — Our pursuit of other lines of business could be constrained by the terms of our indenture”). Other new business concepts that we might pursue could require substantial investments, but none of these efforts are advanced enough at this time to predict what such expenditures might be.

25

FUTURE COMMITMENTS

As of January 3, 2004, we had no capital lease obligations or other long-term liabilities except the Senior Subordinated Notes. The table below sets forth our contractual obligations (amounts in thousands):

INFLATION

Although we cannot determine the precise effects of inflation, we do not believe inflation has had a material effect on our domestic sales or results of operations. We cannot determine whether inflation will have a material long-term effect on our sales or results of operations.

As a result of inflation in prior years, we have in the past adjusted our retail pricing. Further pricing adjustments are contingent upon competitive pricing levels in the marketplace. Management is monitoring the continuing impact of these inflationary trends.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our consolidated financial statements, as discussed under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments and incorporates any changes in such estimates and judgments into the accounting records underlying our consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

26

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. (For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Revenue Recognition

We defer revenue recognition until delivery of the product by estimating the value of transactions in which final delivery to the customer has not occurred at the end of the period presented. The amount of cash received at the time the customer’s order is placed is recorded as a deposit liability and is presented within accrued liabilities. These estimates are based on historical trends and take into consideration current changes in our manufacturing and distribution process.

We currently sell separately priced extended warranty contracts, generally with terms of twelve months. Revenues from the sale of these contracts are deferred and amortized over the life of the contract on a straight-line basis. The costs to service the warranty claims are expensed as incurred. These warranty contracts currently generate a positive profit margin. However, if the utilization rates of these warranties increased significantly, the repair and replacement expense could exceed the sales price of these warranties. If that became the case, we would record a future liability for anticipated warranty claims at the time of sale, instead of expensing the warranty claims as incurred.

Premium revenue is earned from HMO memberships and services. Revenue from premiums is recognized over the life of the policy, generally twelve months, as the related services are rendered.

We must make estimates of potential returns and replacements of all or part of the eyewear sold to a customer. We analyze historical remake and warranty activity, consider current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products when evaluating the adequacy of our estimate of these costs. If management made different judgments or utilized different estimates, this would likely result in differences in the amount and timing of revenue and related costs for any period.

Allowance for Uncollectible Managed Care Receivables

Managed care accounts receivable are recorded net of contractual allowances and reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. A significant portion of our receivables are due from health care plans or third-party administrators located throughout the United States. Approximately 12% of our net sales relate to products sold to customers that ultimately will be funded in full or in part through private insurance plans, third party insurance administration programs or government reimbursement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Any failure on our part to accurately and timely file for reimbursement with these programs can have an adverse effect on our collection results which, in turn, will have an adverse effect on liquidity and profitability.

Estimates of our allowance for uncollectible receivables are based on our historical billing and collection experience. Changes in our billing and collection processes, changes in funding policies by insurance plans and changes in our sales mix within insurance plans may have a material effect on the amount and timing of our estimated expense requirements.

Inventory Valuation

Our inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.

In most cases, the expected sales value (i.e., market value) of our inventory is higher than its cost. However, as we progress through a selling season, certain slow-moving merchandise may be removed from stores and returned to the distribution center to be sold below cost in secondary markets. As a result, there is a high degree of judgment and complexity in determining the market value of such inventories. For inventory on hand, we estimate the future selling price of our merchandise, given its current selling price and its planned promotional activities, and provide a reserve for the difference between cost and the expected selling price for all items expected to be sold below cost.

At the beginning of fiscal 2003, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”). As a result of the adoption of EITF 02-16, certain vendor allowances are now presented as a reduction of inventory cost and subsequently as a component of cost of goods sold.

27

We conduct physical inventory counts for all of our store locations at least twice per year and adjust our records to reflect the actual inventory counts. Cycle counts are performed monthly for inventory in our distribution center and all inventory in our distribution center is counted near the end of the fiscal year. As all locations are not counted as of our reporting dates, we provide a reserve for inventory shrinkage based principally on historical inventory shrinkage experience.

Fresh Start Accounting

In accounting for the effects of the reorganization, we adopted “fresh start” accounting principles as contained in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code” (“SOP 90-7”). SOP 90-7 was applicable because pre-reorganization shareholders received none of our new common stock and the reorganization value of the assets of the Successor company was less than the total pre-petition liabilities allowed plus post-petition liabilities. SOP 90-7 also required that, at the time of fresh start accounting, we early-adopted all accounting principles that were required to be adopted within twelve months following fresh start accounting.

Fresh start accounting principles require that we determine the reorganization value of the reorganized Company. Our reorganization value was developed by management, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and their respective financial advisors. The reorganization value was based on a calculation of the present value of the free cash flows under our financial projections, including an assumption of a terminal value. Such projections were submitted to the bankruptcy court and to creditors for review and objection as part of our disclosure statement accompanying the Plan.

Valuation of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

Our most significant intangible asset is the Intangible Value of Contractual Rights, which was established as part of our adoption of fresh start accounting in May 2001. This intangible asset, which has a value of $93.3 million at January 3, 2004, represents the value of our lease agreement with Wal-Mart and the business relationship therein created. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, this intangible is an amortizable asset because it has a finite useful life. However, the precise length of its life is not known due primarily to the Wal-Mart supercenter conversions that automatically trigger extensions on the contractual life of the asset. Based on our projections, our best estimate of the useful life of this asset is fifteen years. Due to the uncertainty involved in predicting the pattern of economic benefits realized from the Wal-Mart relationship, we amortize this asset using the straight-line method.

We assess the impairment of all identifiable intangibles and long-lived assets on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important, which could trigger an impairment review, include (1) a significant underperformance of vision center operations relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (2) significant changes in the manner of our use of our assets or the strategy for our overall retail optical business; (3) significant negative industry or economic trends; (4) a significant decline or adverse change in the rate or geographic concentration of Wal-Mart host store relocations or supercenter conversions; and (5) a permanent adverse change in cash flows generated by an operation.

Upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we determine if the carrying value of intangibles or long-lived assets may not be recoverable based on a projected cash flow model. If the projected cash flows are not in excess of the book value of the related asset, we measure the impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method. Significant management judgment is required regarding the existence of impairment indicators as discussed above.

Historically, we have operated our vision centers to the maximum term of the lease, including the exercise of all available renewal options in most cases. Our strategy was to maintain store operations, even if the store was under-performing and devote our attention to correcting the store's problems. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we revised our strategy to assess under-performing stores prior to the lease termination date, and potentially close the under-performing stores in order to maximize operating profitability. As a result, we identified certain store locations with a history of operating losses that we do not expect to become profitable without significant cost and effort. We intend to close 13 of these locations in March and April of 2004.

For the 13 locations that we expect to close prior to the lease termination date, we reviewed the locations for potential impairment by comparing the future expected undiscounted cash flows for these locations to the carrying value of their long-lived assets. The long-lived asset carrying value for 12 locations exceeded the future expected undiscounted cash flows from the locations. Therefore, impairment was determined to exist for these 12 locations. We also reviewed the remainder of store locations for potential impairment and identified 30 additional vision centers in Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart de Mexico, Fred Meyer and on military bases which were determined to be impaired given that the expected future undiscounted cash flows from these locations are less than the carrying value of their assets. As a result, we have recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $550,000 to write-down these long-lived assets to their fair market value. Fair market value was determined using the expected discounted cash flows for each location. This impairment was reflected for leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment at these 42 locations.

Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that long-lived assets or intangible assets are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Based on our review of our intangible assets as of January 3, 2004, no impairment was determined to exist.

28

Accounting For Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as equipment depreciation, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the statement of operations.

We emerged from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on May 31, 2001. As part of our plan of reorganization, our capital structure was highly leveraged with $120 million of Senior Subordinated Notes providing for interest at 12% per annum. Before, during and after the bankruptcy process, we incurred significant net operating losses (“NOL”) that resulted in tax loss carry-forwards. A portion of these carry-forwards are subject to limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Generally accepted accounting principles require that we record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset associated with this NOL if it is “more likely than not” that we will not be able to utilize it to offset future taxes. We have provided a full valuation allowance against this net deferred tax asset because our high leverage will make it difficult for us to become profitable, and our historical high leverage substantially contributed to our failure to achieve profitability. We currently provide for income taxes only to the extent that we expect to pay cash taxes for current income.

It is possible, however, that we could be profitable in the future at levels which cause management to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of the NOL carry forward. Upon reaching such a conclusion, we would immediately record the estimated net realizable value at a rate equal to our combined federal and state effective rates. Subsequent revisions to the estimated net realizable value of the deferred tax asset could cause our provision for income taxes to vary significantly from period to period, although our cash tax payments would remain unaffected until the benefit of the NOL is utilized.

Self-Insurance Accruals

We self-insure estimated costs associated with workers’ compensation claims and group medical liabilities, up to certain limits. Insurance reserves are established based on actuarial estimates of the loss that we will ultimately incur on reported claims, as well as estimates of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported. Trends in actual experience are a significant factor in the determination of such reserves. We believe our estimated reserves for such claims are adequate, however actual experience in claim frequency and/or severity could materially differ from our estimates and affect our results of operations.

Other Accounting Policies

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles. See our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which begin on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K which contain accounting policies and other disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Other.” FIN 45 requires footnote disclosure of the guarantee or indemnification agreements a company issues. With certain exceptions, these agreements will also require a company to prospectively recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this Interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees, including product warranty liabilities, issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Our adoption of FIN No. 45 on December 29, 2002 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

29

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of APB No. 50,” (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. Our adoption of FIN 46 does not currently have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”, which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. This statement was effective immediately for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003 and by the first interim period commencing after June 15, 2003 for existing financial instruments. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 does not currently affect our financial position or results of operations.

RISK FACTORS

This Form 10-K contains a number of statements about the future. It also contains statements which involve assumptions about the future. All these statements are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements represent our expectations or belief concerning future events, including any statements regarding future sales levels, the continuation of historical trends, and our liquidity. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

In addition, we, through our senior management, from time to time make forward-looking public statements concerning our expected future operations and performance and other developments. These forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates reflecting our best judgment based upon current information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company and persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this section and elsewhere in this report.

We do not know whether all the forward-looking statements made in this report or elsewhere will prove to be correct. We have tried to identify factors which may cause such statements to be incorrect, but we may not have identified all of them. These factors could also have a negative impact on our results. The following is our non-exclusive list of these factors:

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our Notes.

As a result of the issuance of our 12% Notes due 2009, we are highly leveraged. The Notes are subordinated to our credit facility. As of March 1, 2004, we had outstanding:

Our ability to pay or refinance our indebtedness, including our ability to repay the Notes, or to fund capital expenditures will depend on our future performance. To a certain extent, our performance is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that revenue growth will be realized or that future borrowings will be available under our credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, including the Notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs.

30

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

Our failure to comply with the covenants in the indenture under which our Notes were issued or in our credit facility would result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our ability to continue to generate revenue and operating income depends on our continued relationship with Wal-Mart.

We are substantially dependent on Wal-Mart and its affiliates for our current operations. The following chart shows, as of January 3, 2004, the number of our vision centers that are in Wal-Mart stores and the total number of our vision centers:

Our vision centers located in Wal-Mart stores accounted for substantially all of our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004. Vision centers in Wal-Mart stores rely largely on customer traffic generated by the Wal-Mart host store.

Wal-Mart is under no obligation to provide us with additional vision center leases. We have no basis to believe that Wal-Mart will offer us any additional locations. We also have no basis to believe that Wal-Mart will offer to extend any of our existing leases apart from instances where Wal-Mart is obligated to do so pursuant to the terms of our master license agreement upon the relocation or conversion of a store to a supercenter (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Summary of Lease Agreements”). We will therefore need to replace our sales and operating earnings generated from our Wal-Mart vision centers with sales and operating earnings generated from new business opportunities, which are subject to significant risk and uncertainty (see “Our new business opportunities are unproven”).

31

Our lack of growth could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our Notes.

Average annual revenues in our domestic Wal-Mart vision centers were approximately $580,000 in fiscal 2003. Average annual revenues in the other vision centers that we continue to own were less than $300,000 in the same period. The expiration of our leases with Wal-Mart will cause a reduction in our revenues that we may not be able to replace with revenues generated by other vision centers or by other lines of business we are exploring. We expect that our expenses, however, will increase over time. A combination of lower sales and higher expenses would adversely affect our ability to repay or refinance our Notes, which could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

In addition, in each of the next several years, the base terms of increasing numbers of leases for vision centers under our Wal-Mart agreement will expire. Our rental obligations to Wal-Mart will increase in the three-year option period. We will need to continue to improve sales at these vision centers. If we do not, our rent as a percent of sales will increase significantly during the option period for each of these vision centers. Alternatively, we may choose not to exercise the extension options.

Our new business opportunities are unproven.

Apart from opening optometric offices in California (see “Our operation of optometric vision centers adjacent to Wal-Mart corporate vision centers in California creates financial and regulatory risk”), we are exploring optical concepts in hosts other than Wal-Mart and non-optical concepts in Wal-Mart. There are risks associated with both types of business opportunity, including risks that:

The optical concepts will be subject to the general risks and uncertainties applicable to our current core business in Wal-Mart. The non-optical concepts will be subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including the risk that we will lack sufficient experience and expertise to successfully manage the businesses. The home medical equipment business, in particular, is subject to a number of unique risk factors, including:

Because of the anticipated run-off of our leases with Wal-Mart, we will need to explore and develop these concepts in the shorter rather than the longer term. There is also a risk that, in pursuing these concepts, management will devote less attention to our core business of operating vision centers in Wal-Mart, and that the core business will be adversely affected. In addition, other companies are testing the sales of home medical equipment in Wal-Mart stores. We can therefore provide no assurances that, even if we are successful in these operations, Wal-Mart will offer us additional locations.

32

Our pursuit of other lines of business could be constrained by the terms of our indenture.

The indenture governing our Senior Subordinated Notes limits our operations to those which are “the same, similar or reasonably related to the businesses in which” we were engaged as of the date we emerged from bankruptcy. We are in the process of opening home medical equipment centers in Wal-Mart stores. We are also investigating other concepts. Our indenture could limit our ability to invest in these other lines of business and, generally, could limit our ability to pursue these lines of business. In addition, certain holders of our Notes have previously objected to our engaging in other lines of business. Although we believe that we are in compliance with the indenture and intend to continue to comply with the indenture, we can give no assurance that these holders might not seek to declare a default arising out of our engaging in these lines of business.

Our financial performance may be adversely affected by sales recorded at vision centers scheduled to close under the Wal-Mart agreement.

We have observed sharp declines in sales levels as our vision centers come to the end of their lease term under the Wal-Mart agreement. We expect to close approximately 58 Wal-Mart vision centers in fiscal 2004 and 36 Wal-Mart vision centers in fiscal 2005. In the months prior to their scheduled date of closure, we expect these vision centers to record substantial sales declines. The extent of the sales declines, coupled with the number of vision centers nearing the end of their lease term, could have a negative impact on our sales and our profitability.

Our declining base of vision centers in Wal-Mart stores could make it more difficult for us to compete.

We expect that the number of our vision centers in Wal-Mart stores will substantially decrease over the next several years. A declining base of vision centers, coupled with a decline in cash flow, could impair our ability

Because our optical laboratories and distribution center provide substantially all the eyeglasses and related products we sell at our retail locations, we depend on their regular and efficient operation, and any disruption could have a severe adverse impact on our retail business.

Our manufacturing and distribution center operations are subject to various risks.

Our manufacturing operations are located in Lawrenceville, Georgia and St. Cloud, Minnesota. A fire, flood, earthquake, war, work stoppage, supply shortage or disruption, adverse government action or other disaster or condition at either location could result in a loss of production capabilities and, accordingly, adversely affect our ability to service our retail locations.

We depend on a small number of suppliers for raw materials. Most of the raw materials used in our products are readily available from a number of suppliers at competitive prices, and we have not experienced any significant shortages in obtaining raw materials. While there are currently multiple suppliers of raw materials, we purchase over 50% of those materials from three suppliers. The loss of any of these suppliers, or a significant decrease in the supply of the raw materials, would require us to obtain these raw materials elsewhere. If we were unable to obtain the materials from other suppliers at acceptable prices, our gross margins and our ability to implement our every day low price strategy could be adversely affected. In addition, a third party processes our photochromic lenses using its proprietary technology. We therefore rely on this party for our production of these lenses.

33

We may be adversely affected by environmental and safety regulations to which we are subject. We must comply with environmental laws and regulations concerning emissions to the air, waste water discharges and the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous wastes, and with other federal, state and local laws and regulations. We believe that we possess all material permits and licenses necessary for the continuing operation of our business and believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with the terms of all applicable environmental laws. We cannot assure you that we will operate at all times in complete compliance with all such requirements. We could be subject to potentially significant fines and penalties for any noncompliance that may occur. We cannot predict accurately the potential impact of these laws and regulations on us in the future.

Our manufacturing operations depend in part on our ability to attract and retain personnel with relevant industry experience. The loss of the services of this personnel or the ability to retain such personnel in the future could have an adverse impact on our manufacturing operations.

The efficiency of our manufacturing operations is an essential component of our everyday low price retail strategy. We must continually control our product manufacturing costs and operating expenses. We may not be able to continually control these costs and expenses. To the extent that we do not control these costs and expenses, the ability of our retail locations to compete may be adversely affected.

Our operation of optometric vision centers adjacent to Wal-Mart corporate vision centers in California creates financial and regulatory risk.

Our HMO subsidiary in California has opened five optometric offices adjacent to Wal-Mart in that State and expects to open more such locations in the future. There are risks that:

We do not know the number of offices our subsidiary will open pursuant to this arrangement. The opening of offices in certain geographic locations could be subject to regulatory approval, which could also increase costs and cause delays.

Increased military action abroad could have a negative impact on our operations, particularly those on military bases.

We operate 25 vision centers on military bases in the United States. Increased military action abroad could have a negative impact on these vision centers.

Our use of net operating loss carry-forwards may be subject to limitations.

In conjunction with our historical results from operations, emergence from Chapter 11 and the disposition of our free- standing operations, we incurred significant net operating losses. These losses resulted in significant net operating loss carry-forwards. Our ability to utilize our net operating losses that were realized prior to our emergence from Chapter 11 is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. If our net operating losses realized after our emergence from Chapter 11 are subject to substantial limitation because of a future change of control of the Company or for other reasons, our cash tax costs would increase and have an adverse effect on our ability to repay the Notes. If, after such a change of control, we determined that we would be unable to utilize this tax asset, we could then be forced to write down the asset and record a charge against our financial results.

The right of holders of our Notes to receive payments will be junior to our borrowings under our credit facility, which could adversely affect our ability to pay off the Notes.

Our indebtedness under our credit facility is secured by liens against substantially all of our assets. In the event of a default on our secured indebtedness, or a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of the Company and our subsidiaries, these assets will be available to satisfy obligations with respect to the secured indebtedness before they can be used to satisfy our obligations under our Notes.

34

The terms of our credit facility and the indenture under which our Notes were issued restrict our corporate activities.

Our credit facility contains various restrictive covenants and requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy financial tests, such as a:

Our ability to meet these financial ratios and tests may be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you we will meet these tests. In addition, our credit facility and our indenture limit our ability to take action with respect to:

Our breach of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under our credit facility. If a default occurs, our lender can declare our indebtedness, both principal and interest, immediately due and payable, and could terminate its commitment to make future advances. In addition, a default under the indenture could cause the principal and accrued interest on the Notes to become due and payable. The restrictions in the indenture and the credit facility will likely restrict our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures or general corporate purposes. We have pledged substantially all of our assets under our credit facility and under the indenture. If we fail to repay all amounts declared due and payable, our lender and then the holders of our Notes could proceed against the collateral granted to it to satisfy our obligations. It is likely that our assets would be insufficient to repay in full that indebtedness and our other indebtedness, including the Notes.

We are required by our indenture to make mandatory redemptions of principal owing on our Notes if we generate excess cash flow, which may have an adverse impact on our common stock.

The indenture requires mandatory redemptions of principal out of the excess cash flow that we may generate biannually. There can be no assurances that we will generate enough excess cash flow to make any mandatory redemptions. Prepayments of principal on the Notes, if any, will prevent us from having excess cash to reinvest in our business, and could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

The holders of our common stock may exercise significant control over us.

Former holders of our old Senior Subordinated Notes due 2005 held a large majority of our unsecured debt in bankruptcy, and thus were the initial holders of a significant portion of our common stock. If holders of significant numbers of shares of our common stock act as a group, these holders could be in a position to control the outcome of corporate actions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors. Certain of these holders have already objected to our repurchase of notes and our pursuit of other business opportunities.

35

Holders of our common stock and our notes may elect to sell large blocks of common stock or notes, which may have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock and our notes.

Our former unsecured creditors received our common stock and our notes in exchange for their claims against us. Some or all of the holders of our common stock and notes may prefer to liquidate their investment rather than hold the securities on a long-term basis. The possibility that one or more of the holders of significant numbers of shares of our common stock or a large principal amount of our notes may determine to sell all or a large portion of their shares of our common stock or their notes in a short period of time may adversely affect the market price of the common stock or notes. Partially for that reason, there can be no assurance as to the degree of price volatility in any trading market that may develop for the common stock and the notes. As a result, no assurance can be given that any holder of our common stock or our notes will be able to sell them or at what price any sale may occur. No assurance can be given as to the market price, if any, that will prevail for our common stock in the future. If a market were to exist for our notes, they may trade at prices higher or lower than their face value, depending upon many factors, including, without limitation, the prevailing interest rates, markets for similar securities, industry conditions and the performance of, and investor expectations for us.

Our common stock may be delisted from The American Stock Exchange, if we do not meet certain listing standards.

The rules of the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) allow the exchange to delist securities if the AMEX determines that a company’s securities fail to meet guidelines with respect to corporate net worth, public float, number of shareholders, the aggregate market value of shares, or price per share. We cannot assure purchasers of our common stock or notes that we will continue to meet the requirements of the AMEX. If we are unable to continue to satisfy these criteria, the AMEX may begin procedures to remove our common stock or notes from the exchange. If our common stock or notes are delisted, a trading market may no longer exist, and the ability of shareholders to buy and sell common stock or notes may be materially impaired.

We have not declared dividends in the past, and do not anticipate doing so in the near future, which may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Our credit facility and our indenture prohibit the payment of cash dividends without the consent of the lender and the holders of the majority of outstanding principal amounts under the Notes, respectively. We have never declared or paid any dividend on our capital stock. We currently anticipate that all of our earnings, if any, will be retained for payment of our obligations under the Notes, and then for other corporate purposes, and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The retail eyecare industry is extremely competitive.

The retail eyecare industry is extremely competitive. We compete with national companies, such as LensCrafters and Cole and with numerous regional and local firms. In addition, optometrists, ophthalmologists, and opticians provide many of the same goods and services we provide. The level and intensity of competition can vary dramatically depending on the particular market. We believe that we have numerous competitive advantages, such as our everyday low pricing, product selection, and quality and consistency of service.

We also compete for managed care business. Our competition for this business is principally the larger national and regional optical firms. Competition for this business is driven by size of provider network, quality and consistency of service, and by pricing of vision care services. Successful renewals of certain existing third-party contracts are integral to maintaining sales revenues.

Several of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to engage in extensive and prolonged price promotions which may adversely affect our business. They may also be able to spend more than we do for advertising. If we are not able to maintain our market share of the retail optical industry, our business will suffer. A decline in our earnings could adversely affect the price of our common stock and the notes, and our ability to repay the notes.

Luxottica (the owner of Lenscrafters) and Cole have recently announced that they have entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which Luxottica would purchase Cole. The completion of this merger could have an adverse impact on our ability to compete for managed care accounts and to participate as a provider under managed care arrangements sponsored by the affiliates of Luxottica or Cole. This merger, if consummated, could also have other effects on our retail business which we cannot now predict.

36

Federal and state governments extensively regulate the health care industries.

Both federal and state governments extensively regulate the delivery of health care, including relationships among health care providers such as optometrists and eyewear providers like us. Many states prohibit business corporations from practicing medicine or controlling the medical judgments or decisions of physicians. States often prohibit various financial arrangements, such as splitting fees with physicians.

The fraud and abuse provisions of the Social Security Act and anti-kickback laws and regulations adopted in many states prohibit soliciting, paying, receiving or offering any compensation for making, or causing someone to make, referrals of patients, items or services in some circumstances. The Social Security Act also imposes significant penalties for false or improper Medicare and Medicaid billings. Many states have adopted similar laws applicable to any payor of health care services. We must also comply with federal laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (which governs our participation in managed care programs and which also requires that we maintain the privacy of health information of our customers) and the Food and Drug Administration Act (which regulates medical devices such as contact lenses). In addition, the Stark Self-Referral Law restricts referrals for Medicare or Medicaid covered services where the referring physician has a financial relationship with the service provider. In some cases, the rental of space constitutes a financial relationship under this law. Many states have adopted similar self-referral laws which are not limited to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursed services. Violations of these laws may result in substantial civil or criminal penalties, including double and treble civil monetary penalties, and in the case of federal laws, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

A ruling that we have violated these laws could, for example, result in:

These consequences could have an adverse effect on our business. Also, changes in our relationships with independent optometrists and opticians could adversely affect our relationship with Wal-Mart or our other host stores.

We are subject to state and local regulation of the vision care industry.

The practice of opticianry is regulated in most states in which we do business. In addition, all states regulate the practice of optometry and many states regulate the contracts and other arrangements between optical firms and optometrists. Our failure to comply with these regulations can have severe consequences, including the closure of retail outlets, possible breaches of our license agreement with Wal-Mart, changes to our way of doing business, and the imposition of fines and penalties.

We are subject to increased regulatory risk in the state of California, where in 2002 the California attorney general filed a lawsuit against one of our competitors, alleging that their operations violated state law (see “Legal Proceedings”). The case is expected to be argued in the California Supreme Court later in 2004. In 2003, a Court of Appeal in the State of California held that our method of doing business in the State of California complies with applicable law. There is, however, a risk that, if the California Supreme Court holds that the operations of our competitor violates state law, the California attorney general could begin proceedings against us, notwithstanding our prior successful result in the Court of Appeal. In addition, the regulatory and litigation risk created by the pendency of the litigation by the attorney general could have an adverse impact on our business.

In California, optometrists who practice adjacent to our retail locations are providers to and subtenants of a subsidiary, which is licensed as a single-service Health Maintenance Organization (“HMO”). This subsidiary is regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care. Although we believe that our operations in California comply with applicable law, there are no assurances that the Department of Managed Health Care, the attorney general, or another state authority will not seek to challenge our manner of doing business in the state. Such challenges could force us to change the way we do business, to incur significant expense in litigation and compliance efforts, and could have a material adverse impact on us.

Local ordinances (such as zoning requirements) can also impose significant burdens and costs of compliance. Frequently, our competitors sit on state and local boards. Our risks and costs of compliance are often increased as a result. All of these matters could cause our business to suffer, our ability to repay the notes to be adversely affected, and the trading price of our common stock and notes to decline.

37

The departure of key executives could adversely affect our business.

We depend on the continuing efforts of our executive officers and senior management. The departure of these individuals in significant numbers could adversely affect our business and prospects if we are unable to attract and retain qualified replacements. The run-off of our vision centers could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain management. We do not currently have employment agreements with any personnel, including key executive officers and management. However, we offer our executives and management bonus and stock-based incentives related to our performance.

Failure to have vision care professionals available in or near our vision centers would adversely affect our ability to win managed care and host store contracts, and could prevent us from operating in some states.

Our business and marketing strategies emphasize the availability of independent optometrists in close proximity to our vision centers. Typically, we contract with at least one licensed optometrist to occupy space in or adjacent to each of our stores. Additionally, our agreement with Wal-Mart contemplates that we will make optometrists available at least 48 hours per week if permitted by law. In some markets it may be difficult for us to attract and retain optometrists if our vision centers generate low sales. Historically, if there is no licensed optometrist available to give eye exams, our retail business has suffered.

In some markets, it can be difficult to hire or keep vision care professionals on staff in our vision centers. Failure to maintain a staff of qualified vision care professionals may cause our customers to go elsewhere to provide for their optical needs, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

Many states require that licensed opticians be present when eyeglasses or contact lenses are fitted or dispensed. Any difficulties or delays in securing the services of these professionals could adversely affect our business and our relationship with our host stores. Consequences of difficulty or delay could include termination of our host store licenses for those vision centers, and imposition of legal sanctions against us, including closure of vision centers without licensed professionals.

Our success increasingly depends on our ability to develop and maintain relationships with managed vision care companies.

An increasing percentage of patients receive health care coverage through managed care payors. As this trend continues, our success will increasingly depend on our ability to negotiate contracts with health maintenance organizations referred to as HMOs, employer groups and other private third party payors. We cannot assure you that we will be able to establish or maintain satisfactory relationships with managed care and other third party payors. The run-off of our leases with Wal-Mart will make it more difficult for us to establish and maintain these relationships. In addition, many managed care payors have existing provider structures in place that they may be unable or unwilling to change. The announced merger of our two largest competitors could present additional challenges to our participation in managed care programs (see “The retail eyecare industry is extremely competitive”). Our inability to enter into arrangements with managed care payors in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have established a network of optometrists and other providers located in or adjacent to our stores in order to enhance our ability to contract with managed care payors for both professional services and retail eyewear supplies. Currently, approximately 12% of our revenues are received from managed care payors. We expect this percentage to increase in the future. Managed care contracts include a variety of reimbursement methods, such as fee for service or discounts. Our contracts with managed care companies on the one hand, and with networks of optometrists and other providers on the other, are subject to federal and state regulations, for example:

Insurance Licensure. Most states impose strict licensure requirements on companies that engage in the business of insurance, including health insurance companies and HMOs. Many licensing laws mandate strict financial and other requirements which we may not be able to meet, were we deemed to be engaging in the business of insurance. Additionally, the licensure process can be lengthy and time consuming.

Antitrust Laws. A range of antitrust laws apply to us and our network of optometrists. These laws prohibit anti-competitive conduct, including price-fixing, concerted refusals to deal, and divisions of markets. We cannot assure you that our operations will not be challenged on antitrust grounds in the future.

38

Proposed reforms may affect our earnings and may adversely affect our business.

There have been numerous reform initiatives at the federal and state levels relating to the payment for and availability of healthcare services. We believe that these initiatives will continue for the foreseeable future. If adopted, some of these reforms could adversely affect our financial results, and may adversely affect our business.

We rely on third parties to pay many of our customers’ costs.

A significant portion of medical care in the United States is funded by government and private insurance programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid and company-sponsored health insurance plans. According to government projections, more medical beneficiaries who are significant consumers of eye care services will enroll in managed care organizations. Governmental and private third-party payors try to contain medical costs by:

These cost containment efforts may lead to limitations or reductions in reimbursement for eye care services, which would adversely affect our future sales. Additionally, some reimbursement programs require us to collect payment from third party payors. Our inability to fully collect reimbursable amounts could adversely affect cash flow generated from operations.

We depend on reliable and timely reimbursement of claims we submit to third party payors. There are risks we may not be paid on a timely basis, or that we will be paid at all. Some plans have complex forms to complete. Sometimes our staff may incorrectly complete forms, delaying our reimbursement. These delays can hurt our cash flow and also force us to write-off more of these accounts receivable.

New advances may reduce the need for our products or allow other manufacturers to produce eyewear at lower cost than we can.

Technological advances in the eyecare industry, such as new surgical procedures or medical devices, could reduce the demand for our products. Corneal refractive surgery procedures such as laser surgery, radial-keratotomy and photo-refractive keratectomy may reduce the demand for our products. The development of new drugs may have a similar effect. Technological advances such as wafer technology and lens casting may make our current lens manufacturing method uncompetitive or obsolete. The number of individuals electing Lasik and similar surgical procedures has increased each year, which could significantly decrease demand for our goods and services. These and other medical and technological advances may have a material adverse effect on our operations.

A prolonged economic downturn could have an adverse impact on us.

We believe that a weakening economy may cause an increase in the period of time between repurchases of our retail products by the average consumer, since customers may see replacement purchases of eyeglasses and contact lenses as non-essential. An extension of the repurchase cycle for our retail products would reduce the number of sales of our retail products. Lower sales of our retail products would reduce our revenues.

Operating in other countries presents special risks that may affect our results of operations.

Our Mexican operations face risks substantially similar to those we face in our Wal-Mart stores, including dependence on the host store and limits on expansion. We cannot assure you that our Mexican operations will be able to attain profitability.

Our foreign operations expose us to all of the risks of investing and operating in foreign countries generally, including:

39

Our Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, Indenture, and the company shareholder rights agreement contain provisions that make it more difficult to effect a change in control of the company, which may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws could discourage tender offers or other transactions that would result in shareholders receiving a premium over the market price for our common stock. These include provisions:

The Indenture governing our Senior Subordinated Notes provides that, upon a “Change of Control” (as defined), the Company is obligated to offer to repurchase all outstanding notes at par. A “Change of Control” is defined to include, among other things, the acquisition by a group of 50% or more of our common stock, and the election of a majority of directors who were not approved by a majority of the prior directors. Our shareholder rights agreement provides us with a defensive mechanism that decreases the risk that a hostile acquirer will attempt to take control of us without negotiating directly with our board of directors. It is meant to prevent an acquirer from gaining control of us by paying an inadequate price or by using coercive techniques. The shareholder rights agreement may discourage acquirers from attempting to purchase us, which may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase contemplated by our indenture.

Upon some changes of control of the Company, holders of our notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or a portion of the notes. If a change of control occurs, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds to repurchase all of the notes tendered.

Our failure to repurchase tendered notes would be an event of default under our indenture. Changes of control are also restricted by, and constitute a default under, our credit facility. If the lender under our credit facility were to accelerate our obligations due to a default, it would have a priority claim to the proceeds from the sale of our assets that secure the credit facility.

Our adoption of “fresh start” accounting may make evaluating our financial position and results of operations, as compared to prior periods, more difficult.

Due to our emergence from bankruptcy pursuant to our plan of reorganization, we implemented “fresh start” accounting as of June 2, 2001. In accordance with fresh start accounting, all assets and liabilities were restated to reflect their respective fair values. As a result, the consolidated financial statements for our reorganized company starting on and going forward from June 2, 2001 will not be comparable to our consolidated financial statements for the periods prior to June 2, 2001. The change in our accounting principles may make it more difficult to compare our operations to prior periods.

40

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

Market risk is the potential change in an instrument’s value caused by, for example, fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates. Our primary market risk exposures are interest rate risk and the risk of unfavorable movements in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso. Monitoring and managing these risks is a continual process carried out by senior management, which reviews and approves our risk management policies. We manage market risk on the basis of an ongoing assessment of trends in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and economic developments, giving consideration to possible effects on both total return and reported earnings. Our financial advisors, both internal and external, provide ongoing advice regarding trends that affect management’s assessment. Our operations are not considered to give rise to significant market risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We borrow long-term debt under our credit facility at variable interest rates. (See Note 10 to Consolidated Financial Statements.) We therefore incur the risk of increased interest costs if interest rates rise. At January 3, 2004, we had no outstanding borrowings under our credit facility. Our interest cost under our Senior Subordinated Notes is fixed at 12% through the expiration date of the Senior Subordinated Notes, due 2009.

Foreign Currency Risk

Our division in Mexico operates in a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar. The net assets of this division are exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses, which are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in shareholders’ equity. Such translation resulted in unrealized losses of approximately $141,000 in 2003 and unrealized losses of $274,000 in 2002. Historically, we have not attempted to hedge this equity risk.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included as a separate section of this Report commencing on page F-1.

ITEM 9. DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the date of such evaluation. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Since the evaluation date, there have not been any significant changes in our internal controls, or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the evaluation date.

41

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

We have in place a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our employees, directors and certain contractors. We have also adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and our Controller. We will provide a copy of this Code of Ethics to any person without charge, upon written request sent to: Investor Relations, National Vision, Inc., 296 Grayson Highway, Lawrenceville, Georgia 30045.

With respect to the remaining information called for by this item, we incorporate by reference the section titled “Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement to be mailed to shareholders in connection with our 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We incorporate by reference the section titled “Compensation of Executive Officers” in our Proxy Statement to be mailed to shareholders in connection with our 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

We incorporate by reference the section titled “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Proxy Statement to be mailed to shareholders in connection with our 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

In 2003, Nelson Eye Associates, P.C., which is wholly owned by Dr. Marc Nelson, paid us approximately $300,000 in occupancy fees related to the sub-occupancy of nine of our retail optical locations. Dr. Nelson is a member of our Board of Directors.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

We incorporate by reference the section entitled “Fees of Independent Accountants” in our Proxy Statement to be mailed to shareholders in connection with our 2004 annual meeting of shareholders.

42

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) (1) and (2) The Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule of the Company and its subsidiaries are filed as a separate section of this Report commencing on page F-1.

(3) We have filed or furnished the following exhibits:

Exhibit Number:

Description:

2.1 — First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code, filed by Vista Eyecare, Inc. and certain of its Debtor Subsidiaries, dated April 13, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 1, 2001.

2.2 — Modification to First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code, filed by Vista Eyecare, Inc. and certain of its Debtor Subsidiaries and First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11, Title 11, United States Code, filed by Frame-n-Lens Optical, Inc.; Midwest Vision, Inc.; New West Eyeworks, Inc., and certain of their Debtor Subsidiaries, dated May 17, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 1, 2001.

3.1 — Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company dated April 8, 1992 as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on August 9, 2001.

3.2 — Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, registration number 33-46645, filed with the Commission on March 25, 1992, and amendments thereto.

4.1 — Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on August 9, 2001.

4.2 — Rights Agreement dated as of January 17, 1997 between the Company and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A., incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on January 17, 1997.

4.3 — Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of March 1, 1998 between the Company and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on March 24, 1998.

4.4 — Second Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of June 1, 1999 between the Company and First Union National Bank, as successor to Wachovia Bank, N.A.*

4.5 — Indenture dated as of June 15, 2001 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2002.

4.6 — First Amendment of Indenture dated as of July 6, 2001 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on August 9, 2001.

4.7 — Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 31, 2001 among the Company and the Holders (as defined therein) of registrable securities, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to our Amendment to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed with the Commission on August 22, 2001.

43

4.8 — Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2001 among the Company and the Holders (as defined therein) of registrable securities, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to our Amendment to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed with the Commission on August 22, 2001.

4.9 — Lock-Up Agreement dated May 31, 2001 between Scudder High Yield Series — Scudder High Yield Fund and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2001.

4.10 — Lock-Up Agreement dated May 31, 2001 between U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2001.

4.11 — Second Amendment of Indenture dated as of December 7, 2001 between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2001.

10.1 — Vision Center Master License Agreement dated as of June 16, 1994 by and between Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the Company, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1994, Commission File No. 0-20001.

10.2 — Sublease Agreement dated December 16, 1991 by and between Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the Company, incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, registration number 33-46645, filed with the Commission on March 25, 1992, and amendments thereto.

10.3 — Agreement dated as of November 23, 1995 by and between Mexican Vision Associates Operadora, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Wal-Mart de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. in original Spanish and an uncertified English translation, incorporated by reference to our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 1995, Commission File No. 0-20001.

10.4 — Retail Lease Agreement dated as of March 1999 between Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. and the Company. [Portions of Exhibit 10.4 have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Commission. The omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.]*

10.5 — Lease Extension and Modification Agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 between Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. and the Company. [Portions of Exhibit 10.5 have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Commission. The omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.]*

10.6 — Restated Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan.*++

10.7 — Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 1997, Commission File No. 0-20001.++

10.8 — Form Restricted Stock Award, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 1997, Commission File No. 0-20001.++

10.9 — Restricted Stock Award made as of April 11, 2002 by the Company to L. Reade Fahs, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002.++

10.10 — Form Performance Share Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002.++

10.11 — Form Stock Option 2001 Grant for Employees, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002.++

10.12 — Form Change in Control Agreement, incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2000.++

44

10.13 — Form indemnification agreement for directors and executive officers of the Company, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001.

10.14 — Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement dated as of November 3, 1994 among the Company, A. Kimbrough Davis, as Trustee, and James W. Krause, incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, Commission File No. 0-20001.++

10.15 — Management Incentive Plan.*++

10.16 — Executive Relocation Policy, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30, 1996, Commission File No. 0-20001.++

10.17 — Loan and Security Agreement dated as of May 30, 2001 between the Company and Fleet Capital Corporation, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001.

10.18 — First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 21, 2001 between the Company and Fleet Capital Corporation.*

10.19 — Letter Agreement dated June 30, 2002 between the Company and Fleet Capital Corporation, incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2002.

10.20 — Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 19, 2003 between the Company and Fleet Capital Corporation.*

10.21 — Agreement and General Release dated as of December 27, 2002 between the Company and James W. Krause, incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002.++

21 — Subsidiaries of the Registrant.*

23.1 — Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.*

31.1 — Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a).*

31.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a).*

32 — Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.*

45

(b) The following reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the last quarter of the period covered by this report:

46

NATIONAL VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2004 AND DECEMBER 28, 2002,
THE SEVEN MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND
THE FIVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 2, 2001,
TOGETHER WITH AUDITORS’ REPORT

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

     The following consolidated financial statements and schedule of the registrant and its subsidiaries are submitted herewith in response to Item 8 and Item 14(a)1 and to Item 14(a)2, respectively.

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable, or have been disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements and, therefore, have been omitted.

F-1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

Board of Directors and Shareholders
National Vision, Inc.
Lawrenceville, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Vision, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002 (Successor Company balance sheets), and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 3, 2004 (Successor Company operations), the seven months ended December 29, 2001 (Successor Company operations), and the five months ended June 2, 2001 (Predecessor Company operations). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at page S-1. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the Successor Company consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Vision, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 3, 2004, and the period from June 3, 2001 to December 29, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Further, in our opinion, the Predecessor Company financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the Predecessor Company’s results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from December 31, 2000 to June 2, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 2, 2004

F-2

NATIONAL VISION, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002
(in thousands, except share information)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

National Vision, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002,
the seven months ended December 29, 2001
and the five months ended June 2, 2001
(in thousands, except per share information)